Doe minitab1/26/2024 ![]() Screening DOE (Design of Experiments) with qualitative response Good books on DOE (Design of Experiments) - Recommendations wantedīook, Video, Blog and Web Site Reviews and Recommendationsĭesign of Experiments - DOE with Centre Pointĭesign of Experiments Using Subgroup Data - Conducting a 2^3 factorial DoE Need help on DOE (Design of Experiments) - EPS molding process Minitab - Mixture DOE (Design of Experiments) - Sandability of a GelcoatĬustom DOE (Design of Experiments) Analysis in JMPĭesign of Experiments or Factor analysis using existing data Sample Size Attribute DOE (Design of Experiments)Įxcel files for DOE (Design of Experiments) Taguchi method using Minitab - DOE (Design of Experiments) Help Training courses for DOE (Design of Experiments) Taguchi DOE (Design of Experiments) example using Minitabģ Factor DOE (Design of Experiments) Templateĭocument Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and TemplatesĭOE (Design of Experiments) - Analyse Variation with MinitabĭOE (Design of Experiments) for 3 Variables, Many LevelsĭOE (Design of Experiments) for Accounting - New to Minitab need helpĭesign of Experiments - What tool to use?ĭOE (Design of Experiments) - CQE Primer question Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions Linking the FMEA Causes & Action Plan with DOE Experiments or Experimentation Designĭesign of Experiments to Reduce Variation in a Lathe Operation Taguchi L4 Orthogonal Array Design of Experiments (DOE) in an Excel spreadsheetĮxcel. Minitab Lack-of-Fit Test in DOE (Design of Experiments)Ĭoffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions How to Estimate the Number of Replicates on a DOE (Design of Experiments) When can we apply DOE (Design of Experiments)?Ĭyclic Effect Factoring in DOE (Design of Experiments) Taguchi Experiments for Factorial Design Analysis - Reliability of Minitab ResultsĭOE (design of experiments) in Minitab 16 Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learningĭesign of Experiments - Paper Helicopter Example Power point training slides on DOE (Design of Experiments) Wanted Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) Understanding the applicability of Design of Experiments to the IQ OQ PQ qualification approach ![]() Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPCĭOE (Design of Experiments) Dependent FactorsĭOE (Design of Experiments) with 'Uncontrollable' FactorsĭOE (Design of Experiments) with 3 factors with levels of 3,3 and 5 I do not have a lot of experience using Minitab in this application.Ĭould someone please help explain what I am doing wrong with this software?ĭoE (Design of Experiments) - Multiple responses with different factorsĥ^2 DOE (Design of Experiments) with 3 Replications, 5 Levels 2 Factors It states at the bottom of the stat table the the "denominator of F-test is zero" and also a note stating "could not graph the specified residual type because MSE=0 or the degrees of freedom for error =0. I then proceed to the next step and the General Linear Model statistics do not give a "p" value thus I cannot tell which factors are deemed significant. When I get to step 7 which is "screening the design-fit a model" I enter the response box and click graphs I do not get the option to select the "normal" and "pareto" graphs as in the tutorial when a 2 factor DoE is performed. I have followed the steps as per the tutorial procedure: General full factorial design with 1 replicate for a matrix of 27 runs. I am using Minitab to perform the calculations however I am having some difficulty and I hope I can get some help. The team has decided to explore the three factors with three levels. We are firstly going to collect data at the current settings of the process and go from there however I am looking for some much appreciated direction. We don't have the time or resources to conduct a full factorial design so would a fractional factorial design work? I know Miner mentioned to keep the resolution of the design at IV or greater and I am not 100% sure what this refers to. I have reference material but this is the first DOE I have attempted and obviously a very large and potential complex one. The factors in question are pressure pump time spin time spin speed and maybe dwell time. Some factors would be considered to have 3 levels, however we need to start with 2 levels for each factor. Therefore the team believes there is 4-5 factors contributing to the process. A dimensional change to the product being flow coated has resulted in the flow coat being too thick and out of specifications using the current settings. ![]() The flow coat is applied to a product in a wet state and proceeds through an oven process and comes out in a "fired thickness" state. ![]() Here is my challenge: the team needs to design the optimum setting for a "flow coat process".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |